For over a year now, I have been telling anyone and everyone that the key to Stockton’s image makeover and a thriving downtown area is the Oakland model. Just last month the New York Times published an article titled “Oakland’s Journey From Seedy to Sizzling”. Before voting on transferring the entire arts endowment into general fund; Mayor Ann Johnston and Stockton’s City Council should consider the following quote from NYT: According to research by the Oakland Cultural Trust, an arts advocacy group, for every dollar that Oakland invests in culture, it gets back four dollars in fees, licenses and taxes. Nonprofit arts in Oakland generate more than $103 million in gross annual economic activity and provide around 5,000 jobs, the trust found.
I applaud the aggressive tone Mayor Johnston took, during her State of the City Address, in defense of our city’s image. However, I am concerned that the proposed elimination of the city’s arts endowment will kill one of the key and necessary elements to reforming our city’s image and revitalizing our Downtown area. As a past resident of the Jack London Square District (part of Downtown Oakland) during its own transformation, I’ve seen firsthand how vital a role the arts (and arts community) played in transforming a once blighted neighborhood into a thriving cultural hub and helping change people’s perception of Oakland. I hope Mayor Johnston and Stockton’s City Council will consider the lessons our neighboring port city learned and vote in favor of economic prosperity and protect the arts endowment. Our city’s future and a thriving Downtown area demand it.
Nicholas Hatten
Proudly Returned Stocktonian
(Letter to the Editor submitted to The Record)
(Letter to the Editor submitted to The Record)